Skip to main content

— 2 of 33 —

I turned thir­ty-three ear­li­er this year and despite the fact that most peo­ple think I’m more like forty-three if not nine­ty-three, I am tak­ing advan­tage of this my domini­cal year to begin a sort of pub­lic min­istry that may end in my cru­ci­fix­ion and death. Please don’t mis­take my mean­ing, I have no delu­sions of Mes­sian­ic grandeur, but I nev­er­the­less sus­pect that I have at least thir­ty-three (if not nine­ty-three) things to say that are unlike­ly to be met with enthu­si­asm and so, I fig­ure — fuck it — let’s dance around the third rail and see what happens.

As the coun­try con­tin­ues to roil over cocka­mamy con­tro­ver­sies in pub­lic school­ing over what mate­r­i­al can be taught and what books may be read; enact­ing count­less pro­hi­bi­tions and protests of the same, I have a few thoughts. I read recent­ly that Oklahoma’s Sec­re­tary of Edu­ca­tion has called for a high school teacher to lose her cer­ti­fi­ca­tion for pro­vid­ing a QR code to the Brook­lyn Pub­lic Library, which offers dig­i­tal library cards to stu­dents 13 – 21 any­where in the Unit­ed States.
I am con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly in the deep­est, dark­est, rawest depths of my soul opposed to cen­sor­ship, thought-polic­ing, or any­thing smack­ing of an Index Libro­rum Pro­hibito­rum. In fact, I prob­a­bly end­ed up a good Amer­i­can Protes­tant pre­cise­ly because I adopt­ed the last edi­tion of the index as a required read­ing list at fif­teen. Which is a thing you would entire­ly expect if you knew lit­er­al­ly any­thing about adolescents.
But, and here’s the thing, I’m also a par­ent and I have been blessed with well-behaved, well-adjust­ed, over­all good kids, by near­ly any mea­sure or def­i­n­i­tion of the same, and I have not and would not restrict them read­ing any of the 5,000ish books on the premis­es if they asked. I’d be more wor­ried about han­dling brit­tle bind­ings than what con­tent they might be exposed to.
They’ve been sat­u­rat­ed in books since I read to them in utero. And no one of any ide­o­log­i­cal bent, left or right, could con­vince me that mere access to an idea is a prob­lem. Ideas can’t actu­al­ly be con­trolled and that’s what peo­ple fear most, I think. They des­per­ate­ly want con­trol, but nei­ther chil­dren, their poros­i­ty, their expo­sures; nor ideas, their pro­lif­er­a­tion, their per­sua­sive­ness can actu­al­ly be boxed up and put away. In fact, the very act of pro­hi­bi­tion all but guar­an­tees pur­suit of the prohibited.
It flies in the face of lit­er­al­ly every­thing we observe about chil­dren, not to men­tion basic human psy­chol­o­gy, and yet we still try to assert our pet­ty lit­tle tyran­nies wher­ev­er we may get away with it, how­ev­er ulti­mate­ly counterproductive.
So, I admit, I have been rad­i­cal­ly hon­est and open about the world and its peo­ples from the out­set. I’ve nev­er once in my entire time as a par­ent delib­er­ate­ly cho­sen a book because it was “devel­op­men­tal­ly appro­pri­ate” or refused or waf­fled over a ques­tion because it was hard.
Children’s books can be very enjoy­able, but I’d just as soon read Christi­na Ros­set­ti to them as Dr Seuss. I read poems, short sto­ries, and nov­els indis­crim­i­nate­ly when they were young and I don’t regret it. If any­thing, I avoid­ed real­is­tic nov­els not because they might have “adult sit­u­a­tions” but because they’re gen­er­al­ly as dull as dirt and plod along like, well, real life. Ter­ri­ble way to encour­age a love of lit­er­a­ture in any­one but the already strick­en. Hand­i­ly, they’re a tremen­dous­ly late inno­va­tion and gen­er­al­ly overrated.
See, as the Poet Ter­ence put it, I am a human being, and thus noth­ing human is alien to me. Nei­ther is it alien to my chil­dren, because they’re human beings, too, whole and entire. They’re not par­tial, they’re not sub­hu­man. I have nev­er pre­vent­ed them from hear­ing or ask­ing about any­thing com­mon and recur­rent among human beings, how­ev­er dif­fi­cult, and that includes the pecu­liar bug­bears of those on the right and on the left.
If they ask a ques­tion, I answer it. I nev­er sim­pli­fy, I nev­er bowlder­ize, I nev­er euphem­ize, and I nev­er have. I don’t give them the con­clu­sion I wish they would form as if it were fact, but I explain the vari­eties of opin­ions drawn on sub­jects and why, specif­i­cal­ly, I hold one or anoth­er. I have not with­held from them that the world is full of fol­ly and cru­el­ty and stu­pid­i­ty, vicious small­mind­ed­ness and rapa­cious self-inter­est and, yes, even open­mind­ed­ness so broad it’s entire­ly emp­tied its head and nice­ness so naïve it exac­er­bates the harm it wish­es to relieve.
The only things I var­nish in this life are fur­ni­ture, because wood is dead cells not liv­ing ones and is there­fore frag­ile rather than anti-fragile.
So, yes, rather than let them learn about sex­u­al­i­ty from mis­in­formed class­mates with old­er, equal­ly mis­in­formed sib­lings or from stum­bling upon some sor­did cor­ner of the inter­net, I just explained it all casu­al­ly, upfront, at an ear­ly age. And had to explain it more than once, because there is no once and done in learn­ing. And, yes, because they have known gay and les­bian peo­ple their entire lives that includ­ed same-sex rela­tion­ships, which are clear­ly not pro­cre­ative and don’t fit into the tidy “how are babies made” expla­na­tion. Chil­dren are not idiots, we’re con­de­scend­ing infan­tiliz­ers with con­trol com­plex­es. There’s a dif­fer­ence. They know you’re not telling them some­thing and they won­der why and they will fall down rab­bit­holes to find out.
Unlike their par­ents, they’ve also nev­er not lived in a com­mu­ni­ty full of peo­ple with the full spec­trum of skin tones. They’ve nev­er known a world where peo­ple aren’t just all mixed up togeth­er. But again, they’re not idiots. They won­der why more of the kids that look like them do bet­ter in school and don’t get into fights. They can see with their own eyes that most of the home­less aren’t pink peo­ple and they won­der why? I have to answer those ques­tions or try. They can either read it in a book or they can hear about it on the street, either way, there’s no con­ceal­ing the real­i­ty that we have con­tin­u­al­ly vot­ed into pow­er peo­ple who have ensured that the cumu­la­tive effects of slav­ery, seg­re­ga­tion, red-lin­ing, and cul­tur­al hos­til­i­ty to black and brown peo­ple con­tin­ues to this day.
I do not sub­scribe to the “appro­pri­ate” and “inap­pro­pri­ate” school of sub­ject mat­ter for chil­dren or so-called polite con­ver­sa­tion more gen­er­al­ly. There are mere­ly sub­jects and there is the capac­i­ty to under­stand those sub­jects ful­ly or par­tial­ly. Many adults show less facil­i­ty with them than chil­dren do. So, to answer the ques­tion posed to me the oth­er day “When are you writ­ing your par­ent­ing book?” I’m not, because par­ent­ing books are uni­ver­sal­ly ter­ri­ble. And I real­ly do not believe that any degree of anx­ious striv­ing to par­ent well actu­al­ly works. It’s like food, the more you think about the diet over a cer­tain basic thresh­old the poor­er the dietary out­comes. Instead, I’ll set myself apart as the pari­ah: If they want to read it, they’re wel­come to try. I am who I am today because the library was a place with­out lim­its beyond my own lit­er­a­cy, which improved only through expo­sure to things beyond its powers.
Whether it’s Ayn Rand’s wood­en heroes, scarce­ly cred­i­ble vil­lains, or harsh­ly cat­e­gor­i­cal think­ing or some­thing like James Baldwin’s ‘Anoth­er Coun­try,’ with its emo­tion­al feroc­i­ty and haunt­ing car­nal­i­ty, be my guest, read away. And if a librar­i­an or a school teacher ever declines a request for a book, I have a QR code to the Brook­lyn Pub­lic Library and/​or a deb­it card. Because let us be hon­est, adults are the ones who are uncom­fort­able, we’re the ones anx­ious and trau­ma­tized by ideas, pro­ject­ing our own dis­com­fort on our chil­dren until final­ly they project it back. We’re the ones clutch­ing the apron strings for dear life try­ing to pre­serve an inno­cence we con­fect­ed for a world that has nev­er existed.
If you want to have some influ­ence over your chil­dren, what lit­tle you can have, mod­el for them val­ues that have tan­gi­ble out­comes, don’t lie to them about the true shape of things, encour­age them to be cre­ative and crit­i­cal, and just don’t be a puri­tan­i­cal hyp­ocrite who equates coer­cion with love and pro­hi­bi­tion with learning.
It has been my expe­ri­ence, that the more that is freely giv­en and duti­ful­ly taught, the less these peren­ni­al­ly anx­i­ety-induc­ing sub­jects assert their thrall. I could list the bevy of taboos about which I have been hon­est, so that my chil­dren are versed in them well enough that they don’t fix­ate upon them, they’re not entire­ly undone by the very thought of humanity’s most intractable and mul­ti­va­lent char­ac­ters and con­di­tions, but I sus­pect it would make the typ­i­cal Amer­i­can audi­ence deeply uncom­fort­able. And that’s the trou­ble with a cul­ture of patron­iz­ing con­ceal­ment and proud men­dac­i­ty, its con­se­quences linger on and on through­out the life­long ado­les­cence we style adulthood.
And this is all my sub­tle­ty and this is all my wit, god give thee good enlight­en­ment, my mas­ter in the pit, for behold all earth is laid in the peace which I have made, and behold I wait on thee to trou­ble it…