We are pre­dictable crea­tures because fun­da­men­tal­ly we are for­ev­er dri­ven by the same crude impuls­es, what­ev­er scat­tered data in what­ev­er era or cir­cum­stance bears upon them. His­to­ry doesn’t rhyme, the human mind does. And, as Koho­let said in the reg­is­ter of 4 and 50 learned men, “What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is noth­ing new under the sun.”

Who­ev­er … is over­run with sus­pi­cion, and detects arti­fice and strat­a­gem in every pro­pos­al, must either have learned by expe­ri­ence or obser­va­tion the wicked­ness of mankind, and been taught to avoid fraud by hav­ing often suf­fered or seen treach­ery; or he must derive his judg­ment from the con­scious­ness of his own dis­po­si­tion, and impute to oth­ers the same incli­na­tions which he feels pre­dom­i­nant in him­self. — John­son, Ram­bler N° 79, 18 Decem­ber 1750

One stud­ies his­to­ry, its events, its peo­ple, its arts, its rul­ing pas­sions, not because one is randy for antique, but because it is the clear­est and most illu­mi­nat­ing view into who we still are. Evo­lu­tion mixed us up, made us fool­ish­ly believe in a kind of moral and intel­lec­tu­al pro­gres­sion, nev­er­mind that its muta­tions work much more slow­ly than record­ed his­to­ry… Our most mean­ing­ful advances are the work of cul­ture, but cul­ture must always sub­mit to the bare­ly changed mechan­ics of clever grease which we’ve been deploy­ing for sev­er­al hun­dred thou­sand years.

Strip away the gild­ing and the rhetoric of progress, and the same grub­by hand is always revealed under­neath. We flat­ter our­selves with con­sti­tu­tions, with dec­la­ra­tions of rights, with lofty pre­am­bles to char­ters and treaties; but beneath every proud inscrip­tion lurks the same hunger for dom­i­nance, the same ter­ror of loss, the same appetite for plea­sure, the same cow­ard­ly desire to avoid pain. Alexan­der, Cae­sar, Napoleon, Stal­in, Trump — it is one con­tin­u­ous pro­ces­sion of the same lizard-brained urges adorned in dif­fer­ent regalia.

Our tech­nolo­gies and fash­ions per­suade us that nov­el­ty has arrived, that some rup­ture has occurred in the old fab­ric of things. Yet the wars of Twit­ter dif­fer lit­tle in kind from the wars of pam­phlets, and the self-right­eous mobs that doxx and destroy with hash­tags are no more refined than the crowds that once jeered out­side pil­lo­ries. The same hot bile of envy and cru­el­ty cours­es through us; we mere­ly press it through more effi­cient ves­sels. The soul has not kept pace with the machine.

If there is any true advance­ment in our con­di­tion, it lies not in the chimera of evo­lu­tion­ary leaps or polit­i­cal slo­gans about being “on the right side of his­to­ry,” but in the hand­ful of frag­ile insti­tu­tions and cus­toms that restrain us from becom­ing whol­ly bes­tial. And these, like any archi­tec­ture, are for­ev­er in dan­ger of col­lapse, because they rest on the quiv­er­ing foun­da­tion of human self-dis­ci­pline and main­te­nance. The span of civil­i­ty is always one care­less gen­er­a­tion away from ruin.

What his­to­ry teach­es, then, is not the smug con­so­la­tion that things improve, but the sharp­er, more hum­bling les­son that things repeat. Each new out­break of zealotry, each fash­ion­able tyran­ny, each erup­tion of vio­lence is only the old human stock rehears­ing its famil­iar rôle. The wheel spins; the play­ers change cos­tumes. The plot is the same because we are the same.