Skip to main content

In some deeply iron­ic ways, the anti-Amer­i­can alliances that are already begin­ning to form — such as the Euro­pean Union bol­ster­ing and expand­ing trade agree­ments with the very part­ners with whom we’re either sev­er­ing ties or try­ing to bul­ly into sub­mis­sion — as well as the defi­ant resis­tance on dis­play around the world in oppo­si­tion to the clum­sy dick-wag­ging of Napoleon Bone-Aspur may actu­al­ly deliv­er the anti-glob­al­ist, post-colo­nial far left the very vic­to­ry they wanted. 

I won­der if the far right real­izes this? 

The sharp reduc­tion of the Unit­ed States’ sphere of influ­ence, unwind­ing both the Mon­roe and Tru­man Doc­trines, and desta­bi­liz­ing the impe­r­i­al thrall of the Unit­ed States; giv­ing strate­gic adver­saries like Rus­sia, Chi­na, and Iran an open­ing to deep­en their ties and cement their influ­ence glob­al­ly; not to men­tion the advan­tages grant­ed to Latin Amer­i­can economies and India in a realign­ment of the world order as our his­toric allies cre­ate new trade alliances that exclude the Unit­ed States, where once the strength of those alliances ensured pref­er­en­tial treatment.

I often won­der if the warhawks who think that no one can over­come us because of our mil­i­tary might real­ize that you still have to pay for that mar­tial suprema­cy and that that requires a deft hand at secur­ing all of the eco­nom­ic resources nec­es­sary to do so… what hap­pens when the rest of the world decides that they’d much rather share those resources among them­selves? This is, in fact, how super­pow­ers rise and fall. 350 mil­lion peo­ple ver­sus 7,572,000,000 peo­ple? What are the odds we bul­ly our ways out of being side­lined as irrelevant?

Amer­i­cans may yet learn how incred­i­bly expan­sive their indi­vid­ual afflu­ence real­ly was… and the lev­el of lifestyle con­trac­tion, mate­r­i­al con­ser­va­tion, envi­ron­men­tal despoila­tion, and bru­tal­iz­ing labor that will be nec­es­sary to retain even a sliv­er of it in the absence of glob­al supremacy. 

We could have cho­sen to do bet­ter on our own terms, instead of react­ing like petu­lant chil­dren to the slight­est increase in the cost of sus­tain­ing an unsus­tain­able stan­dard of liv­ing. Now, it may just be done to us on some­one else’s terms. I sus­pect that it won’t go over all that well with peo­ple who think our post­war ascen­dan­cy was mer­it-based instead of dumb luck and oppor­tunism as the rest of the world lay in sham­bles rebuild­ing itself from the ground up, but then they may be backed into a cor­ner of their own mak­ing hav­ing sur­ren­dered the pos­si­bil­i­ty of chang­ing by choice.