Skip to main content

Some­one once described my rela­tion­ship to the house as one of root­ed entwine­ment, that it lived in some way and its pas­sions and plaints were con­veyed up through a net­work of inter­con­nect­ed neu­ronal-like roots, run­ning through me and out of me into the struc­ture itself. If a pipe rat­tles or a light flick­ers or the foun­da­tion shud­ders, I feel the snaking ten­drils and inter­wo­ven matri­ces of mol­e­cules vibrat­ing mean­ing through my dous­ing-rod-like limbs and com­mu­ni­cat­ing con­di­tions to my inmost soul. Not in so many words, but that was their gist…

Strange­ly, that’s not that far off.

I’ve often lament­ed that our soci­ety is not so nat­u­ral­is­tic or mate­ri­al­is­tic as we’d some­times like to believe. In fact, we’re not mate­ri­al­is­tic enough. We’re not nat­u­ral­is­tic enough. If we were, our rela­tion­ship with the nat­ur­al and the mate­r­i­al would not be near­ly so shal­low and dom­i­neer­ing, so repug­nant to stew­ard­ship and sus­tain­abil­i­ty, so con­sum­ing and destruc­tive and ulti­mate­ly self-immolating…

We’ve large­ly ceased to com­mune with our envi­ron­ments, save in the most shal­low of ways. We don’t rec­og­nize the natured dimen­sions of our built envi­ron­ment, think­ing arti­fi­cial­i­ty is always a con­test with nat­ur­al forces — some sort of raw, sub­lime, roman­ti­ciz­ing noble sav­agery — rather than mere­ly anoth­er facet of nature’s infi­nite­ly faceted inter­ac­tions. We don’t real­ly rec­og­nize the puls­ing, throb­bing agi­ta­tions of the mate­r­i­al from which we are com­pos­it­ed inter­act­ing with the mate­ri­als on which we are fun­da­men­tal­ly and irrev­o­ca­bly depen­dent and by which we are sur­round­ed and in which we’re saturated.

A once abstract­ed pas­sion for old build­ings has over time devel­oped into a sort of bod­i­ly tun­ing fork, syn­chro­niz­ing my expe­ri­ence with the con­crete real­i­ties of those atoms erect­ed by us into com­plex sys­tems of enshel­ter­ment. If you lis­ten close­ly, every­thing speaks and its speech is such that only we can hear it. We need to lis­ten more close­ly, not just to the sub­audi­ble speech of the organ­ic beings out­side, but that which is trig­gered in the very cen­ter of all mate­r­i­al existence.

Things speak. It doesn’t take a great deal of effort, only time and patience, to lis­ten to their voic­es. Ask any crafts­men how her fin­gers know how to manip­u­late the most dis­crete and minute of mate­ri­als, shav­ing off microm­e­ters with her crude, stub­by fin­gers? She won’t be able to describe the process, only that there is some sub­con­scious rela­tion­ship between the thing and her­self. There’s some­thing in the del­i­cate recep­tiv­i­ty of our nerves that detects more than we con­scious­ly know. You too can send out roots into a world preg­nant with mean­ing, try­ing to com­mu­ni­cate its every fiber with your every fiber.

Orig­i­nal Illus­tra­tion by Adam Bond, © 2020